Friday, May 6, 2011

Geronimo!

The more alert and aware people of diverse social groups become of their rights, privileges and dignity, the more difficult it becomes to stay politically correct all the time. It has become well-nigh impossible to make public jokes about racial and gender stereotypes. You have to call the head of a university department a ‘chair’ these days, because both chairman and chairwoman are insulting to one or other group of sensitive people, and chairperson never really caught on. Now I hear that some native American Indians are up in arms demanding an apology from US government authorities for using ‘Geronimo’ as a codename for Osama bin Laden during the military operation that killed the latter recently (see, for instance, this link). The way things are going, commanders planning super-secret military operations are going to spend more time worrying about appropriate codenames than about the details of the operations!

6 comments:

Debotosh said...

Sir,
I read this thing in today's newspaper and was slightly surprised to see the reactions of the native american Indians on the use of codeword "Geronimo" in the bin laden encounter episode! What i came to know about Geronimo is that he was a heroic figure amongst the natives and was not at all a bin-laden kind of terrorist ! But is it really correct for the Indians to get so angry with so trivial a thing ? Do they really know the mechanism behind these super-secret military missions? If not then why such fuss ? God knows what would have happened if such a thing had occurred in India . We would have had yet another 'revolution-on-streets' kind of thing !

Debotosh said...

This appeared in today's Hindustan Times :

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/columnsothers/Cowboys-and-codenames/Article1-693893.aspx

Tushar Das said...

Had, say, they code-named it "Buddha" or "Gandhi" (asuming the hypothetical scenario that they had little knowledge of who these figures were), you would still be writing this post, I believe? If you would, then that's a great thing, becasue it is always easy to get annoyed when "others" talk of their rights ... esp. if these 'others' are some stupid native people...!

Suvro Chatterjee said...

Sure I would, Mr. Das: it's my job here to laugh at folly, no matter who it is that's being foolish! I had no problems with the Indian government messaging in code back in 1998 that 'The Buddha has smiled' when we set off our (second-) atomic bomb in Pokhran, though I remember laughing at how deliciously inapposite the codename was. The real 'enemy' is thin-skinned, dull-witted people who take themselves too seriously and are entirely lacking in a sense of humour!

And where you really get off the deep end is calling native Americans 'stupid' - I wouldn't dream of putting labels like that on whole huge sections of the human populace. Individuals are stupid or smart, not races...

May 9, 2011 11:35 AM

Shilpi said...

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/now-j-k-rowlings-the-casual-vacancy-enrages-sikhs/1010794/

While reading this news bit - I was reminded of this post of yours. Of course all hell breaks loose these days if anybody makes a joke about racial or gender stereotypes, and even in context. I'm not sure whether to add a few of my own words (and I haven't read the book as yet) but even critiquing racism makes the writer a racist? This probably partially explains why I've not only been termed a racist by one anonymous student but have also been described in more colourful terms more recently, so I found out. I'm assuming the Sikhs up in arms have not read the book or have understood nothing.

Shilpi said...

I was reading this article on Remarque's bit on "short people" and wasn't sure where the writer was going. The article really did keep me guessing till the last couple of lines....

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-literaryreview/at-the-short-end/article4470653.ece?ref=sliderNews

P.S: regarding your comment for your latest post - thank you. I'm almost thinking I should write a blogpost on it.