…and
talking about technology and ‘technical’ people, it always gets my goat to hear
people restricting those terms, out of a combination of total ignorance and
foolish vanity, to engineers. A carpenter, a potter, a chef or a shawl weaver
is quite as much a technical person as any engineer is – the fact that he might
not have gone to engineering school, and that his work may not in the current
milieu command so good an income and ‘status’ as an engineer’s has everything
to do with the way society chooses to value different things, and nothing at
all to do with the level and intricacy of the skill involved (I have said
before that Salman Khan does nothing at all, in the eyes of any sensible man, that
makes him intrinsically worth 5000 times more than a computer code writer and
50,000 times a commando guarding our borders: it merely shows that we are an
uncivilized society). Indeed, in more civilized countries even drivers and
domestic help command such salaries that only millionaires can afford them,
leave alone low-level techies.
Also,
‘technique’ is limited to machinery only by the very stupid. As any language
teacher knows, prosody is a highly technical skill. There is very sophisticated
technique involved in music and dance (leaving aside the chimp varieties, that
is). To grasp the technique of painting or writing might take a lifetime: as
the hugely successful novelist John le CarrĂ© famously said in his seventies, ‘I think I am
beginning to understand how to write’ (Matter of fact: in all my thirty odd
years of teaching, I have dealt with literally thousands who were good at math and physics, and I can count on my
fingers how many of them could ever write even a decent letter).
So let my
readers in future use these words more circumspectly.